JISC CETIS 2010 Day 1 Parallel Subverting & Integrating Corporate Systems

Get Started. It's Free
or sign up with your email address
JISC CETIS 2010 Day 1 Parallel Subverting & Integrating Corporate Systems by Mind Map: JISC CETIS 2010 Day 1 Parallel Subverting & Integrating Corporate Systems

1. Intro

1.1. Sharepoint

1.1.1. 78% HEIs using document mgt collaboration targeting information improving/automating cross institutional processes

1.1.2. why have a VLE if you have sharepoint? why have sharepoint if you have a standards based, distributed, repository backed VLE? or a standards based process driven web service delivered platform? unicorn! so portal v best of breed

1.2. JISC Programmes

1.2.1. curriculum design

1.2.2. DVLE

1.2.3. FSD

1.2.4. XCRI

2. Fantasy Curriculum Management System

2.1. Requirements

2.1.1. Scope/Definition Just Course Catalogue Core Data Enriched Data Course Delivery? Course Selection Big Picture = Big System

2.1.2. Different Audiences Student Informed Choices Teachers Employers

2.1.3. Learning Outcomes

2.1.4. Rules Extensions not Exceptions

2.1.5. Lifecycle

2.1.6. Data Entry/Modification

2.1.7. Open Data Persistence Versioning Course Ontology

2.1.8. Workflow Agile

2.1.9. Analytics

2.1.10. Costing Would know how much a course costs!!!! Sensitive data Most difficult area Different pricing for different models (combination/delivery) Costs Loss leaders Price point choices

2.2. Key (System) Players

2.2.1. Student Record System

2.2.2. Timetabling

2.2.3. Room Booking

2.2.4. Finance

2.2.5. VLE

2.2.6. Content Repositories

2.3. Interoperability

2.3.1. Seamless!

3. Southampton Learning Environment

3.1. what

3.1.1. central services hub learning teaching living appropriate to university role

3.1.2. vehicle for reviewing and aligning processes

3.1.3. flexible systems

3.1.4. single login

3.2. why

3.2.1. student experience

3.2.2. staff experience

3.2.3. employability

3.2.4. efficiencies

3.2.5. scale

3.2.6. teaching space problem

3.3. architecture

3.3.1. corporate systems

3.3.2. student facing applications

3.3.3. RDF layer (or some form of open data) web services?

3.3.4. portal front Sharepoint

3.4. system groupings

3.4.1. communications

3.4.2. fee payment/records

3.4.3. infrastructure

3.4.4. cloud services

3.4.5. push

3.4.6. resources

3.4.7. learning services

3.5. rich learning environment

3.5.1. personal space

3.5.2. institutional space

3.5.3. support space

3.5.4. social space

3.5.5. good for learning (external resources)

3.6. AGILE development

3.6.1. POCs potential quick wins personalised timetable option selection booking rooms for group work well me what bus I need to get to my lecture on time tutee information and progress

3.6.2. done research portal grant bids projects groups academic CV generation

4. Strathclyde

4.1. DRIVER: Reorganisation and Reviews

4.1.1. Aspirations Remove steps Remove repetition Single Source Data Simplify Access to Data

4.1.2. Homegrown corporate systems 1 Oracle Database: 4000 tables

4.1.3. Course and Class Approvals Process Modelling Information not Data Decision Points not Timings or Criteria Generalised model BPMN

4.2. Architecture and Technologies

4.2.1. Presentation Layer Tools Sharepoint UI jQuery AJAX ASP.NET ? Why not a BPEL process platform ?

4.2.2. Service Layer Orchestration Service Interfaces Message Types

4.2.3. Business Layer Domain Model Business Entities Business Workflows

4.2.4. Data Access Layer O/R Mapping Service Agents

4.2.5. Data Stores Tools SQL Server Sharepoint Lists Document Libraries Needed due to limits of Sharepoint

4.3. Data

4.3.1. Data structures not the problem

4.3.2. Making information timely and relevant is

4.4. Corporate v Education

4.4.1. Entrepreneurs Control is this subverting then?

4.4.2. Innovators Promote

4.5. Standards/Specifications

4.5.1. Driven by external demands

4.5.2. Poor fit internally

4.5.3. No desire to adopt external models for internal apps

5. Staffordshire

5.1. Problems

5.1.1. Point to Point integrations

5.1.2. Reporting/Business Intelligence

5.1.3. External Examiner Appointment Process

5.2. Development

5.2.1. Agile

5.2.2. Continuous Delivery - not releases

6. My Thoughts

6.1. open data layers vs corporate portals and standardisation

6.1.1. published structures/apis

6.1.2. published guidance on standards

6.1.3. encouraging mashups/portlets/applications institutional app store discouraged by sharepoint usage

6.1.4. authentication/privacy OAuth?

6.2. entrepreneurs vs innovators

6.2.1. standard experience/delivery

6.2.2. channel alliance

6.3. Strategy or Skunkworks?

6.3.1. high level support

6.3.2. enterprise architecture

6.3.3. roadmaps

6.3.4. portals

6.4. Process/Architecture v Facts/Rules

6.4.1. what's the best framework

6.4.2. who is building glossaries and rule repositories? not just processes or architectures not just domain models published apis and data standards taxonomies and ontologies

6.4.3. this is what we need to do not this is how we do it

6.4.4. standardise inputs/outcomes not control the bit in the middle

6.4.5. personas and scenarios

6.4.6. facts then rules then processes information/data decisions/rules process/workflow service connectors

6.5. Architecture v Ecologies

6.5.1. data, services and frameworks

6.5.2. not so much on the structure

6.6. mostly standardisation not subversion

6.7. CampusM not EA starting point for SOA

7. MMU

7.1. Barriers

7.1.1. Reasons for Vagueness reasonable behaviour in small units

7.1.2. Change Everything!

7.1.3. Rollover + tinkering

7.2. Not really Sharepoint

7.2.1. Getting the Point of Sharing

7.3. Joined Up Imagination

7.3.1. blend specialist expertise

7.4. Creative Dialogue

7.4.1. scenarios

7.4.2. prototyping

7.4.3. stakeholder walk-through workshops

7.4.4. enterprise architect know how identifiers for integration joining islands

7.5. myMMU

7.5.1. shame corporate systems into developing web services

7.5.2. apis.mmu web service feeds

7.5.3. Sharepoint + Mobile